The Libertine
Jul. 31st, 2006 12:40 amOn The Libertine.
I liked this movie on a few levels, not the least of which was the handheld camera-work and the shifty focus. It was so different from what you normally see, and it struck me right away. Also, holy crap, did not know that Jack Davenport was in this. I like him more and more. Yay for Jack Sparrow and Norrington in another movie together. ;)
And Johnny Depp was just brave and superb. There were parts where I was giggling and thinking, "OMG this is porn!" and parts where I was cringing. Places that other actors are afraid to go? Johnny goes there.
(Tangentially, it occurs to me that a lot of attractive actors and actresses do daring roles like this, and especially roles where they have this incredible transformation into something hideous--think Jared always getting his face trampled--and I have to wonder why. Actually, no I don't. Like rich people are not afraid to spend their money freely, beautiful people are not afraid to spend their looks. IIRC Jared made a comment in an interview once, "I don't care about looking good." Of course you don't. And by that same token, JK Rowling and Bill Gates don't care about making money. When you have something in abundance, you have the luxury of not having to worry about it. Anyway.)
The Earl of Rochester has always been a subject of great interest to me, or at least since college when one of my professors exuberantly taught some of his work. I seem to remember that said professor was somewhat enamoured of Rochester, and thus, because I idolized a few of my professors, and this guy was one of them, so was I enamoured of Rochester. (I've half a mind to look him up and email him to get his thoughts on this movie.)
But you know what I liked best in this movie? Lizzie Barrie, played by Samantha Morton. (Although it irked me how she was supposed to be a "plain woman" like that was a bad thing. God help me, I'd take "plain" over what I am on any day.) But anyway, since lately I seem to be surrounded by people in life, in movies, and on the internet who are just besotted with OMG TEH ROMANCE and coupliness and sappiness, *vom*, her character was quite refreshing. "Men are hurdles that must be negotiated" and "I did not wish to be your wife. I do not wish to be anyone's wife. I wish to continue being the creature I am." Can I get an amen? I love how she does just exactly what she wants, gets what she wants, and never gives herself up to him. It made me feel vindicated. And it was just a movie.
And speaking of, the way Rochester spoke of the theater being a substitute for what real life lacks is sometimes the way I feel about movies. O_o That can't be good. When he tells Jane that he thinks he's in love with an actress, she asks if he's seen her out of the theater. When he says no, she says, "Then it's the theater. It's not her." Word.
It was a decent film.
I liked this movie on a few levels, not the least of which was the handheld camera-work and the shifty focus. It was so different from what you normally see, and it struck me right away. Also, holy crap, did not know that Jack Davenport was in this. I like him more and more. Yay for Jack Sparrow and Norrington in another movie together. ;)
And Johnny Depp was just brave and superb. There were parts where I was giggling and thinking, "OMG this is porn!" and parts where I was cringing. Places that other actors are afraid to go? Johnny goes there.
(Tangentially, it occurs to me that a lot of attractive actors and actresses do daring roles like this, and especially roles where they have this incredible transformation into something hideous--think Jared always getting his face trampled--and I have to wonder why. Actually, no I don't. Like rich people are not afraid to spend their money freely, beautiful people are not afraid to spend their looks. IIRC Jared made a comment in an interview once, "I don't care about looking good." Of course you don't. And by that same token, JK Rowling and Bill Gates don't care about making money. When you have something in abundance, you have the luxury of not having to worry about it. Anyway.)
The Earl of Rochester has always been a subject of great interest to me, or at least since college when one of my professors exuberantly taught some of his work. I seem to remember that said professor was somewhat enamoured of Rochester, and thus, because I idolized a few of my professors, and this guy was one of them, so was I enamoured of Rochester. (I've half a mind to look him up and email him to get his thoughts on this movie.)
But you know what I liked best in this movie? Lizzie Barrie, played by Samantha Morton. (Although it irked me how she was supposed to be a "plain woman" like that was a bad thing. God help me, I'd take "plain" over what I am on any day.) But anyway, since lately I seem to be surrounded by people in life, in movies, and on the internet who are just besotted with OMG TEH ROMANCE and coupliness and sappiness, *vom*, her character was quite refreshing. "Men are hurdles that must be negotiated" and "I did not wish to be your wife. I do not wish to be anyone's wife. I wish to continue being the creature I am." Can I get an amen? I love how she does just exactly what she wants, gets what she wants, and never gives herself up to him. It made me feel vindicated. And it was just a movie.
And speaking of, the way Rochester spoke of the theater being a substitute for what real life lacks is sometimes the way I feel about movies. O_o That can't be good. When he tells Jane that he thinks he's in love with an actress, she asks if he's seen her out of the theater. When he says no, she says, "Then it's the theater. It's not her." Word.
It was a decent film.